A Matter of Perspective
In the vast tapestry of religious narratives, we often encounter stories that are meant to teach us about faith, obedience, and the nature of the divine. Yet, sometimes, the interpretations of these stories reveal more about the biases of the interpreters than they do about any inherent truth. This is starkly evident when comparing the biblical tale of Abraham’s near-sacrifice of Isaac with the Yazidi narrative of Tawûsê Melek’s refusal to bow to Adam. While Abraham is lauded as the epitome of faith for his willingness to kill his son at his God’s command, Tawûsê Melek, for refusing to worship Adam in preference to God, is often condemned as a figure of satanic rebellion by the very same people who venerate Abraham. This striking contrast exposes the complex and often contradictory ways we understand obedience and the divine will.
The story of Abraham, found in the Hebrew Bible and the Quran, is a cornerstone of Abrahamic faiths. Abraham’s God commands him to sacrifice his beloved son Isaac (or Ishmael, in Islamic tradition). Abraham, without question, prepares to follow through with this horrific act. Just as he’s about to strike the fatal blow, Abraham’s God intervenes, providing a ram as a substitute. This is typically presented as a testament to Abraham’s unwavering faith – his willingness to follow his God, even when it flies in the face of reason, human compassion, and fundamental morality. He is praised as an example for all believers, demonstrating the ultimate submission to the divine will.
Now, consider the story of Tawûsê Melek, often referred to as the Peacock Angel, central to Yazidi belief. According to Yazidi tradition, God created Tawûsê Melek, a powerful angel, and then created Adam. God then commanded the angels to bow down to Adam. Tawûsê Melek refused, arguing that he was made of God’s light and could not bow to anyone but God Himself. Seeing this as an act of profound devotion, God ultimately praised Tawûsê Melek for his steadfastness and made him the chief of the angels.
Outsiders in the Abrahamic faiths though, often interpret this act as disobedience. As a result, Tawûsê Melek is often associated by them with the concept of Satan, and the Yazidis themselves have faced centuries of persecution and accusations of devil worship because of it.
The stark contrast in the interpretations of these two seemingly similar acts of obedience/disobedience is jarring. Both Abraham and Tawûsê Melek were faced with a supposed divine command that seemed ethically challenging. Yet, Abraham’s willingness to engage in what we might consider horrific behaviour is deemed an act of pious submission, while Tawûsê Melek’s refusal to bow to anything but God is considered an act of rebellious defiance.
Why this discrepancy? It comes down to a matter of perspective and the frameworks through which these narratives are viewed. Abraham’s story is framed within a tradition that emphasises unquestioning obedience to a supposed deity. The emphasis is placed on blind faith and submission to authority. His willingness to sacrifice his son becomes the ultimate testament to this unwavering devotion.
In contrast, Tawûsê Melek’s act is understood within Yazidi theology as an act of supreme loyalty and singularity of worship. His refusal is not seen as rebellion, but as a demonstration of his unwavering devotion to the one true God. He prioritises monotheism over submission to a newly created being, and this act, in the Yazidi understanding, is seen as noble, a testament to his unwavering loyalty to the creator.
The demonisation of Tawûsê Melek and the veneration of Abraham highlight a deep-seated human tendency to interpret religious narratives through our own pre-established frameworks. We often project our own biases onto these stories, reinforcing our existing beliefs and prejudices. The differing interpretations also highlight the power of narrative control. Those who have historically held dominant positions have the power to shape and define which stories are deemed righteous and which are labelled as heretical.
This comparison underlines the importance of engaging with diverse perspectives and questioning our own assumptions when examining religious texts and traditions. For instance, I think it’s vital for us to be in the habit of questioning and doubting the character of any supposed spirit being who commands blood sacrifice, whether human or animal.
The stories of Abraham and Tawûsê Melek, though seemingly disparate, invite us to consider what truly constitutes faith, and whether obedience, when blindly followed, is always the most virtuous path. Perhaps true faith involves critical thinking, a commitment to ethical principles, and a willingness to question authority, even when that authority claims a divine source.
Worldwide Temple of Aurora 