The Circular Reasoning of Using the Bible to Prove the Bible

The Bible is one of the most widely read and respected books in the world, considered by many to be the word of God. However, using the Bible to prove the Bible’s own validity and truth is a flawed approach that can lead to circular reasoning and undermines the credibility of the text. This principle also applies to other perceived holy books.

Circular reasoning occurs when someone uses what they are trying to prove as part of the proof of that thing. In the case of the Bible, this would mean using biblical passages or stories to demonstrate the Bible’s accuracy, reliability, or divine inspiration. This approach creates a closed loop where the Bible’s validity is assumed from the outset, rather than objectively examined and established.

There are several reasons why using the Bible to prove the Bible is not the best approach:

Lack of Objectivity: By relying on the Bible to prove its own validity, one is not approaching the text with a truly objective and critical mindset. This can lead to confirmation bias, where an individual only seeks out and accepts information that supports their pre-existing beliefs.

Reliance on Presuppositions: When using the Bible to prove the Bible, one is starting with the assumption that the Bible is true. This presupposition can cloud judgement and prevent an individual from considering alternative explanations or interpretations of the text.

Absence of External Corroboration: When relying solely on the Bible for proof of its own validity, there is a lack of external corroboration. This means that there are no independent sources or evidence to support the claims made within the text. This can weaken the credibility of the Bible and make it more difficult for sceptics to accept its teachings.

Inconsistencies and Contradictions: The Bible, like any other ancient text, contains inconsistencies and contradictions. Using the Bible to prove the Bible can lead to ignoring or explaining away these issues, rather than addressing them directly and objectively.

Limited Scope: By focussing solely on the Bible for proof of its own validity, one is limiting the scope of inquiry. There are numerous other sources of information and evidence, both religious and secular, that can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the Bible and its teachings.

This same principle applies to other perceived holy books, such as the Quran, the Bhagavad Gita, or the Book of Mormon. Relying solely on these texts for proof of their own validity can lead to circular reasoning, a lack of objectivity, and the potential for confirmation bias. Instead, it is crucial to approach these texts with an open mind and a willingness to consider alternative explanations and interpretations, while also seeking out external corroboration and engaging in critical analysis.

Using the Bible to prove the Bible is not the best approach for establishing the text’s validity and credibility. This method can lead to circular reasoning, a lack of objectivity, and the potential for confirmation bias. Instead, it is essential to approach the Bible and other perceived holy books with an open mind, seeking out external corroboration, engaging in critical analysis, and considering alternative explanations and interpretations. By doing so, one can cultivate a deeper and more nuanced understanding of these texts and their teachings.