The question of God and sexuality has been a source of both profound beauty and deep conflict throughout history. For many religious traditions, sex is a sacred act, intertwined with creation and human connection. Yet, simultaneously, religious institutions have often been at the forefront of sexual repression, shame, and rigid rules. But what if we take a different starting point? What if we consider the very premise of a creator God – whether you envision this being as a He, She, They, or a more abstract force – and ask: if this entity designed the universe and everything within it, including sex, could they possibly be anything but fundamentally “sex-positive”?
The very notion of design implies intention and purpose. Imagine an engineer carefully crafting a complex machine. They wouldn’t introduce a function, a vital component, only to then deem it inherently negative or shameful. If God, in any form, is the ultimate architect of existence, then human sexuality isn’t some accidental byproduct. It’s woven into the very fabric of our being.
Let’s break down what “sex-positive” really means in this context. It doesn’t necessarily equate to a hedonistic free-for-all. Instead, it’s about fundamentally valuing sexuality as a healthy, natural, and potentially joyful aspect of human life.
It encompasses:
Embracing pleasure: If God designed our bodies with pleasure centres linked to sexual activity, could this be anything other than intentional? Pleasure isn’t a mistake; it’s a motivator, a reward, a vital part of the human experience. Dismissing sexual pleasure as inherently sinful feels like a direct contradiction to the very biology we’re gifted with.
Celebrating connection: Sex, in its myriad forms, is a powerful tool for connection – physical, emotional, and spiritual. It fosters intimacy, vulnerability, and deep bonds between individuals. If God is a God of love and connection, wouldn’t a capacity for such profound human linking be considered a divine gift?
Acknowledging diversity: Human sexuality is wonderfully diverse. From different orientations and identities to varied expressions of desire and intimacy, the spectrum is vast and beautiful. If God is a creator of such incredible biodiversity in the natural world, why would human sexuality be any different? To impose rigid, narrow definitions feels limiting and dismissive of the complexity and richness of creation.
Respecting consent and boundaries: A truly sex-positive perspective isn’t about reckless abandon. It’s fundamentally rooted in respect, consent, and healthy boundaries. True design would surely prioritise ethical and respectful interactions. Exploitation, coercion, and abuse are distortions of the intended good of sexuality, not inherent to its design.
Challenging shame and stigma: Many religious traditions have historically (and often currently) perpetuated shame and stigma around sex, especially outside of narrowly defined contexts. But if God designed sex, why would there be an inherent need for shame? Shame often arises from societal pressures and misinterpretations, not from a divine decree to view a natural function as inherently dirty or sinful.
Of course, this perspective doesn’t negate the complexities and potential challenges associated with sexuality. Just like any powerful force, sex can be misused, distorted, and cause harm. But the existence of misuse doesn’t negate the inherent value of the thing itself. Fire can warm and cook, but also burn and destroy. We don’t condemn fire; we learn to use it responsibly and respectfully.
Similarly, a sex-positive theology – one that aligns with the idea of a designing God – would focus on responsible, respectful, and joyful engagement with our sexuality. It wouldn’t shy away from the complexities or ignore the potential for harm, but it would start from a place of affirmation and appreciation for this fundamental aspect of human existence.
Ultimately, pondering the question of God’s sex positivity is a journey of re-evaluation. It challenges us to move beyond inherited dogma and consider the logical implications of a creator God. If we believe in a divine designer, it begs the question: why would they create something so powerful and integral to human life, only to then deem it inherently flawed or shameful? Perhaps, by embracing a sex-positive lens, we can rediscover a more authentic and liberating understanding of both our spirituality and our sexuality, recognising them as intertwined and divinely inspired aspects of the human experience.
Worldwide Temple of Aurora 