Elon Musk’s recent video message to Tommy Robinson’s rally, urging attendees to “fight back or die,” has ignited a firestorm of criticism, and for good reason. The timing and context of these remarks are particularly concerning, especially when juxtaposed with the events that transpired at the rally itself.
The phrase “fight back or die” is inherently inflammatory. In any context, it suggests a call to arms, a rejection of peaceful resolution in favour of confrontation. When delivered via video link to a gathering that, as has been widely reported, saw police officers injured and a disturbing call for a political assassination from one attendee, the irresponsibility of Musk’s statement reaches a new level.
Tommy Robinson’s rallies have often been associated with far-right ideologies and, at times, have devolved into scenes of unrest. To align oneself with such a movement and to employ rhetoric that could be interpreted by malcontents amongst the crowd, as a green light for aggression, particularly when law enforcement is present and potentially at risk, is not merely careless but actively dangerous.
The fact that one protestor was reportedly heard calling for the assassination of the prime minister serves as a chilling testament to the potential consequences of misguided rhetoric. While it is crucial not to draw a direct causal link between Musk’s words and every individual action at the rally, his endorsement, however indirect, of a group where such extreme behaviours are evidenced, is undeniably problematic.
Musk, as a figure with immense global influence, carries a significant responsibility for the impact of his words. His pronouncements, whether delivered through his own platforms or to external gatherings, have the power to shape public discourse and, regrettably, to incite action. Employing language that prioritises confrontation over dialogue, especially in a setting with a history of volatility, demonstrates a profound lack of judgement and a seeming disregard for the potential harm it can inflict.
The pursuit of free speech is a cornerstone of many societies, but it is not absolute. It does not, and should not, extend to a direct, or an indirect, clear or oblique incitement of violence, particularly when that incitement is delivered in the presence of those tasked with maintaining public order. Elon Musk’s “fight back or die” message, in the context of a far-right rally marked by violence and extremism, crosses a critical line, revealing an irresponsible streak that jeopardises public safety and undermines reasoned discourse.
—
Read more on the political reaction to Musk here:
Worldwide Temple of Aurora 