In the bustling digital squares of social media, follower counts have become a prevalent, often sought-after, metric. A high number of followers is frequently perceived as a sign of popularity, influence, and, by extension, perhaps even success or value. We see individuals and brands striving to increase their numbers, believing it correlates with worth or credibility. But does having many followers truly equate to good character or intrinsic value?
The simple, uncomfortable answer is a definitive no. And history offers a stark, pre-digital reminder of this crucial distinction.
Before the age of algorithms, likes, and share buttons, influence was garnered through speeches, rallies, propaganda, and control over information. Adolf Hitler, a figure synonymous with evil and destruction, commanded a massive following. Millions were captivated, manipulated, or coerced into supporting his vile ideology. His popularity was undeniable, a terrifying groundswell of support that fuelled unspeakable atrocities. Yet, not a single follower, nor the sheer volume of his adherents, could ever suggest that he possessed good character or that his ideas held any positive value. His influence was built on hate, fear, and deception, not on integrity, empathy, or wisdom.
The mistake people make when they equate a large social media following with intrinsic worth mirrors this historical fallacy. In the digital realm, the pursuit of followers can lead to many things, few of which are reliable indicators of a person’s true nature or the substance of their message:
Sensationalism and Controversy: Often, the quickest way to gain followers is through shock value, extreme opinions, or engaging in public spats. This appeals to curiosity and a thirst for drama, but it requires little to no integrity or thoughtful contribution. A large following gained this way speaks more about societal fascination with spectacle than the account holder’s character.
Algorithmic Appeal over Substance: Social media algorithms often favour engagement – comments, likes, shares, saves. Content designed solely to trigger this engagement, even if it’s shallow, misleading, or repetitive, can rack up followers. This prioritises strategy over substance, visibility over value.
Appealing to Negative Traits: Just as Hitler exploited fear and prejudice, some online figures gain traction by appealing to anger, division, conspiracy theories, or confirmation bias. A large following built on negativity is a testament to the platform’s reach, not the leader’s virtue.
Paid Followers and Bots: Unfortunately, the digital landscape is rife with artificial inflation of numbers. Many accounts gain thousands, if not millions, of followers through buying fake accounts or using bots. These numbers are entirely meaningless in terms of human connection or influence, let alone character.
Niche Appeal vs. Universal Value: Some people have large followings because they are experts or highly engaging within a very specific niche. While this indicates knowledge or skill in that area, it doesn’t automatically translate to overall wisdom, ethical behaviour, or good character in other aspects of their lives.
Superficial Connection: Following someone online is a low-commitment action. People follow for entertainment, inspiration in a narrow area (like fitness or cooking), news updates, or even out of morbid curiosity or to criticise. It rarely signifies a deep respect for the person’s complete character or a thorough endorsement of all their views and values.
True character is demonstrated through actions, integrity, empathy, resilience, and the positive impact one has on others’ lives – often offline and away from public view. Value lies in knowledge, skill, creativity, kindness, wisdom, and the contributions made to society or individual well-being. These qualities are built over time through effort, reflection, and ethical choices.
Equating follower count with character or value is a dangerous oversimplification. It encourages a focus on superficial metrics over genuine substance. It risks elevating those skilled in self-promotion, manipulation, or controversy while overlooking individuals who quietly contribute immense value through integrity, hard work, and genuine compassion, often without seeking or gaining massive online popularity.
Just as the millions who followed Hitler did not validate his evil, a vast digital following today does not inherently validate a person’s character or the worth of their ideas. We must cultivate discernment, looking beyond the seductive numbers to evaluate individuals based on their actions, their words’ substance, and the true nature of their influence. The valuable individuals are the ones with integrity and positive impact, regardless of how many digital eyes are on them.
Worldwide Temple of Aurora 