Predestination vs Predetermined Multiverse
The concept of predestination, the belief that events in one’s life are predetermined, is a philosophical and religious tenet shared by various schools of thought. Stoicism, some branches of Hinduism, and specific interpretations of Christian theology are among those that subscribe to this idea. However, a fascinating intersection of this belief with quantum physics raises intriguing possibilities. Could the postmodern understanding of the universe, pioneered by physicists like Richard Feynman and David Deutsch, also support a predetermined multiverse?
Predestination in Faith and Philosophy
Stoicism, founded by Zeno of Citium, posits that the universe is governed by a rational, providential entity called Logos. In this framework, everything happens for a reason, and individuals cannot change their ‘destiny’, only how they respond to it. Similarly, some Hindu and Islamic traditions, such as fatalism in Sufism, suggest that our lives are predetermined by divine decree.
In Christianity, the debate around predestination often revolves around the intention of God for humanity. Romans 9:22-23 and Ephesians 1:4-5 suggest a God who prepares some for destruction and the elect for salvation. Yet, the same Bible also implies free will in passages such as Deuteronomy 30:19, “This day I call the heavens and the earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live.”
Predestination in Quantum Physics
Richard Feynman’s sum over histories principle challenges our linear view of time. It postulates that every possible trajectory of a quantum particle is taken, and what we perceive as a single outcome is merely the observer’s perspective of one branch of a vast, multiverse tree. In this context, the future is not written in stone but exists as an infinite number of possibilities, with only one becoming our reality.
David Deutsch, building on Feynman’s work, proposes the existence of parallel universes, each representing a different outcome of our decisions. He argues that every decision we make spawns into multiple universes, each branching out with different outcomes. This creates an intricate web of multiverses, where our lives are not predetermined by divine decree but by the very act of decision-making.
A Predetermined Multiverse?
Feynman’s and Deutsch’s theories, at first glance, suggest a radical departure from traditional predestination. Yet, let’s examine this assertion more closely. If, as Feynman suggests, all possible trajectories exist before one is chosen, doesn’t this imply that the outcome, while not set in stone, is already predetermined by the nature of the system itself? Similarly, if every decision spawns parallel universes, as per Deutsch, aren’t the possibilities nonetheless finite, dictated by the quantum mechanical properties of particles? Once all possible outcomes have been exhausted, the ‘limit’ of possibilities reached, doesn’t this also suggest a predetermined number of possible outcomes?
Quantum Stoicism: Embracing the Unavoidable
Viewing the universe through a quantum-stoic lens allows us to reconcile the tension between free will and predetermination. Just as the Stoics believed we could not control the ‘flood’ of events, we find in quantum physics that our control over outcomes is constrained by the nature of the microcosm. The ‘flood’ of possible universes, in Feynman’s words, “all exist, simultaneously…each one equal in rehabilitation.”
In this light, perhaps predestination and the predetermined multiverse are two sides of the same coin. Both propose a universe where our control over outcomes is finite, and our role lies not in changing our ‘fate’ but in embracing it, much like the Stoics advocated. Indeed, as Epictetus noted, “Do not seek to have events happen as you want them to, but instead, want them to happen as they do happen, and your life will go smoothly.”
Embrace the multiverse, for we are all actors playing our roles in this vast, predetermined web of possibilities.


