Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s actions in the ongoing conflict, much like those of Hamas, have crossed a line, demanding strong condemnation. Recent reports indicate that Israeli forces have been responsible for the deaths of over 400 individuals, a tragic toll that includes innocent men, women, and children. This escalating violence raises serious ethical questions about the nature of the response. Nietzsche’s warning—that those who fight monsters must be careful not to become monsters themselves—resonates deeply in this context.
Hamas is undeniably a deeply malevolent organisation, led by individuals who have demonstrated a shocking disregard for human life. The terrorist attack on Israel on October 7th, 2023, was a horrific and utterly unjustifiable act of aggression. Israel, understandably, had the right to respond and to pursue the recovery of the hostages taken captive during that attack. This right to self-defence is a principle no impartial observer would deny.
However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s response has been characterised by excessive violence, and a seeming indifference, to the devastating loss of innocent lives. This approach suggests a disturbing parallel between his actions and the very behaviours he purports to oppose. The scale of the casualties, particularly among civilians, raises concerns that the response has become disproportionate and indiscriminate.
Furthermore, some reports allege that Netanyahu is manipulating events to maintain his grip on power, particularly in light of the ongoing corruption charges he faces. These allegations, if true, suggest a cynical use of the conflict for personal gain, further eroding trust in his leadership and undermining the legitimacy of Israel’s actions on the world stage.
The international community must adopt an even-handed approach, unequivocally condemning the actions of both Hamas and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Justice and accountability demand no less. A failure to hold both sides accountable for their actions risks perpetuating a cycle of violence and undermining any prospect of a lasting peace. The focus should be on de-escalation, humanitarian aid, and a return to meaningful negotiations that address the root causes of the conflict and prioritise the safety and well-being of all civilians.
—
Worldwide Temple of Aurora 