Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy’s book, Jesus and the Goddess: The Secret Teachings of the Original Christians, presents a controversial but compelling thesis: that early Christianity was not a radical departure from existing Pagan mystery traditions, but rather a form of Gnosticism, sharing core mystical ideas with these earlier movements. Their work delves into the symbolic language and cosmological perspectives that they argue formed the “mystery religion” underlying both Pagan and early Christian practices. Examining specific passages from the book reveals key aspects of their interpretation of Gnosticism and its presence across different spiritual traditions, including Islam.
One striking assertion, found on page 109 in the section titled ‘The Virgin of Light’, is: “Christian Gnostics, like Pagan Gnostics before them, teach that this world is the underworld.” This statement encapsulates a fundamental concept within many Gnostic systems. Unlike mainstream religious views that might see the material world as God’s good creation, Gnostics often perceived it as inherently flawed, a prison, or a realm of illusion and suffering. This physical reality was not created by the ultimate, true God, but by a lesser, ignorant, or even malevolent deity or force, often referred to as the Demiurge or the Archons. The true divine realm, the Pleroma (the Fullness), exists beyond this material plane. Thus, for the Gnostic, living in this world was akin to residing in an “underworld” – a place of darkness, separation from the divine light, and entrapment for the pneumatic or spiritual spark within the individual. This perspective provided a stark contrast to the perceived ignorance and spiritual deadness of the material world and its inhabitants, who were often seen as mere psychic or hylic (material) beings lacking the divine spark.
Continuing in the same section, on page 111, Freke and Gandy state: “The figure of the Virgin of Light is equivalent to the higher Sophia.” This highlights the importance of divine archetypes and their symbolic nature in Gnostic thought, as interpreted by the authors. Sophia (Greek for “Wisdom”) is a central figure in many Gnostic cosmologies. She is often depicted as an Aeon (a divine emanation) from the Pleroma who, through a misguided desire or disturbance, emanates outside the divine realm, leading to the creation of the material world and the Demiurge. The “higher Sophia” typically refers to her state within the Pleroma before her emanation, or perhaps a redeemed or perfected aspect of her. By equating the “Virgin of Light” with the higher Sophia, Freke and Gandy are suggesting this figure represents a pure, divine feminine principle associated with the divine light, potentially symbolising the divine spark within creation or the means by which humanity can ascend back to the Pleroma, mirroring Sophia’s own journey of fall and potential restoration. This connection underscores the symbolic nature of Gnostic figures, seen not just as historical entities but as representations of cosmic processes and inner spiritual states.
The practical aspect of Gnosticism, according to the authors, is emphasised on page 71: “The Gnostic path of self-knowledge can be thought of as a journey to God…” This statement clarifies that Gnosticism is not merely a set of beliefs about cosmology, but a path focussed on direct, experiential knowledge (gnosis). Unlike faith (belief in something unseen), gnosis is understood as an inner knowing, the recognition of the divine spark within oneself and its connection to the ultimate divine source. The “journey to God” is therefore not a physical pilgrimage or solely an act of external worship, but primarily an internal process of self-discovery. By understanding one’s true nature – that the individual “self” is fundamentally a piece of the divine light trapped in the material “underworld” – the Gnostic can begin the process of liberation. This self-knowledge is the key to transcending the limitations of the material world and the control of the Demiurge, allowing the divine spark to return to its ultimate source in the Pleroma. The path involves practices aimed at achieving this inner realisation, often involving meditation, asceticism, or specific rituals designed to awaken gnosis.
Freke and Gandy’s broader perspective on Gnosticism is that it represents a perennial mystical tradition found in various guises across different cultures and religions. They argue that what has historically been labelled “Gnosticism” by orthodox Christianity (often pejoratively) was in fact a powerful mystical current that predated and influenced early Christianity, and continued in various forms thereafter. They see shared symbolism, cosmology (like the idea of a flawed material world vs. a true divine realm), and the emphasis on inner, experiential knowledge (gnosis) as evidence of this underlying tradition.
Their exploration extends to Islamic esotericism, specifically mentioning Islamic Gnostics and the Ismaili tradition. They highlight how this perspective aligns with the Gnostic emphasis on hidden knowledge. On page 206, they note: “According to the Ismailis, as well as exoteric or ‘outer’ teachings, Mohammed imparted to his closest students secret esoteric or ‘inner’ teachings.” This mirrors the Gnostic distinction between the superficial, literal understanding available to the masses and the deeper, hidden truths accessible only to initiates or those with spiritual insight. The exoteric (zahir) are the outward practices and literal interpretations of religious texts, while the esoteric (batin) are the inner meanings and spiritual realities. Islamic Gnostics, like Sufis and Ismailis, prioritise access to this batin.
This emphasis on layered meaning is further illustrated by their description of the practice of ta’wil on page 206: “Islamic Gnostics… emphasize the practice of ta’wil – understanding teachings on many levels simultaneously. They relate a saying of Mohammed: ‘The Quran has an outer and an inner meaning and the inner meaning has in turn and inner meaning, and so on up to seven inner meanings’.” Ta’wil is essentially symbolic or allegorical interpretation, a method used to penetrate beyond the literal sense of scripture to uncover hidden spiritual truths. The saying attributed to Mohammed perfectly encapsulates this idea of layered reality and layered understanding. Just as the Gnostic sees the material world as a veil over a deeper divine reality, the Islamic Gnostic sees the Quran and other teachings as having multiple layers of meaning, with the ultimate truth hidden beneath the surface, accessible only through spiritual insight and interpretation (ta’wil). This resonates strongly with the Gnostic quest for gnosis – the ability to see beyond the illusion (the “underworld”) and perceive the true light and reality.
Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy’s Jesus and the Goddess presents Gnosticism not as a minor heresy but as a central mystical stream that flowed through various ancient traditions. They interpret Gnostic concepts such as the material world being an “underworld,” the significance of divine figures like Sophia/Virgin of Light representing aspects of the divine truth, and the path to God being an inward journey of self-knowledge (gnosis). Their inclusion of Islamic Gnosticism, with its emphasis on secret esoteric teachings (batin) and multi-layered interpretation (ta’wil), further supports their thesis of a shared, cross-cultural pursuit of hidden spiritual knowledge and the recognition of a deeper reality beyond the apparent surface.
This interpretation offers a compelling narrative of Gnosticism as a profound and universal quest for inner divine understanding.
Worldwide Temple of Aurora 