Imagine a candle set on a table in a quiet room. When the wind is still, the flame is steady, warm, and inviting. When a gust rushes through, the flame wavers, sputters, and sometimes flares into a sudden blaze before being snuffed out. If you watch closely, the candle seems to have a mind of its own—alternately drawing you toward its comforting glow and then jerking you away with an unexpected gust. This is the paradoxical rhythm of a manipulator: hot and cold, nasty and nice, close then distant. To understand why they move in such erratic patterns, we have to look beyond the surface flicker and into the storm that feeds it.
The Engine of Control
At the heart of every manipulative swing lies a single, unshakable motive: control. Control isn’t the same as domination; it’s the subtle art of steering another’s emotional compass without them ever realising they’ve been given a map. The hot‑and‑cold cadence is a masterstroke in this art because it keeps the target off‑balance.
Hot moments—the love‑bombing, the sudden generosity, the whispered compliments—are the “fuel” that lights the candle’s flame. They create a surge of dopamine, a biochemical pat on the back that tells the other person, “You’re safe here; you can trust me.” The brain, eager for that reward, leans in.
Cold moments—the silent treatment, the snide comments, the abrupt withdrawal—are the gusts that extinguish the flame just enough to provoke anxiety. The brain, now deprived of its reward, flares up with cortisol. The target becomes hyper‑vigilant, constantly scanning for the next spark.
Intermittent Reinforcement
The alternation of these states produces what psychologists call an intermittent reinforcement schedule, a psychological principle that makes the behaviour more resistant to extinction than a steady, predictable pattern would. Think of a slot machine: the occasional jackpot keeps the player pulling the lever long after a string of losses. A manipulator’s hot‑and‑cold swings are the emotional equivalent of that slot‑machine jackpot.
The Power of Uncertainty
By switching between warmth and withdrawal, the manipulator keeps you off balance. You never quite know which version of them will show up. That uncertainty becomes a magnet: you invest energy, attention, emotion, because you crave the moment when they’ll be nice again, when they’ll smile or apologise. Every tad of kindness feels like a triumph, every cold shoulder like a punishment. You learn to read every nuance, seeking clues in tone of voice or nod of the head, as if they were signals to a code that unlocks their favour.
Control Through Emotional Whiplash
Emotional highs and lows are also a control tactic. By being frighteningly unpredictable, manipulators seize authority over the narrative of your day, your mood, even your sense of self. When they’re sweet and attentive, you feel seen—and you start to doubt yourself when they turn icy. “Did I really annoy them?” you wonder. “Was it something I said?” Self-doubt is their silent ally; in that doubt, they remain the only stable point on your emotional compass.
The Duality of “Nasty” and “Nice”
A manipulator often dons two masks: one of the caring confidant, the other of the scathing critic. The switch isn’t random; it’s a strategic choreography that serves three hidden purposes.
Feeding Insecurity with a Drip
A manipulator’s nasty outbursts serve to feed your insecurities, to make you question your worth if you don’t comply. Then, just when you’re at your lowest, they’ll soften again—maybe an apology, a gift, a romantic gesture. You’re so relieved by the reversal that you overlook how little they’ve changed at heart. That drip-drip of disdain followed by occasional affection becomes a habit you can’t break, because every bit of kindness feels like hope renewed.
Testing Boundaries
By slipping from “nice” into “nasty” at a moment’s notice, the manipulator gauges how far the other person will go to preserve the relationship. If the target shrugs off a biting comment to restore the prior warmth, the manipulator learns that the target’s self‑esteem is pliable enough to be molded.
Creating a Narrative of “You’re the Problem”
The alternating kindness and cruelty makes it easy for the manipulator to rewrite the story: “When you’re good, I love you. When you’re not, I’m forced to be harsh.” This reframes the manipulator’s own aggression as a reaction, not a choice, and nudges the target to assume responsibility for the toxicity.
Safeguarding the Manipulator’s Self‑Image
No one likes to see themselves as a monster. The “nice” interludes allow the manipulator to keep their own conscience from eroding completely. It’s a self‑preservation tactic. The internal dissonance is softened, making the cruelty easier to sustain.
The Push‑Pull of Proximity
Why do manipulators swing from intimate closeness to sudden distance? The answer lies in the ancient human need for attachment security and the manipulator’s fear of losing the very control they crave.
Closeness as a Magnet
When the manipulator leans in—sharing secrets, offering “exclusive” support—they create a sense of exclusivity, a feeling that the target is part of an inner circle. This deepens emotional investment, anchoring the target’s identity to the manipulator’s.
Distance as a Deterrent
Once the bond is forged, the manipulator pulls away just enough to remind the target of their own vulnerability. The distance is a threat: “If you value this, you’ll stay.” It also creates a vacuum that the target is compelled to fill, often by trying to regain the closeness they just lost.
Self‑Preservation
The manipulator also fears being “known.” The more intimate a relationship becomes, the more the target sees the manipulator’s cracks, hypocrisies, and hidden agendas. By pulling back, the manipulator maintains a protective barrier, keeping the relationship at a safe, controllable distance.
The pattern of “close‑then‑distant” is, therefore, a self‑fulfilling prophecy. The target learns to chase, to placate, to anticipate the next moment of affection—all while the manipulator quietly watches the tug‑of‑war from the sidelines, satisfied that they remain the dominant force in the dance.
The Emotional Weather Map
If you were to chart a manipulator’s behaviour on a weather map, the picture would be a tornado of contradictions:
—
Heat
Condition: Warm, sunny, inviting.
Actions: Compliments, gifts, “we’re in this together”.
Result: Trust, dopamine high.
—
Cold
Condition: Blizzard, silence, biting winds.
Actions: Silent treatment, criticism, withdrawal.
Result: Anxiety, cortisol surge.
—
Nice
Condition: Gentle, rain, nurturing.
Actions: Acts of kindness, “I’m here for you”.
Result: Gratitude, loyalty.
—
Nasty
Condition: Thunderstorm, lightning strikes.
Actions: Sarcasm, blame, aggression.
Result: Self‑doubt, guilt.
—
Close
Condition: Clear skies, intimacy.
Actions: Deep conversations, shared secrets.
Result: Attachment, dependence.
—
Distant
Condition: Fog, obscured view.
Actions: Physical or emotional withdrawal.
Result: Pursuit, fear of loss.
—
The pattern is deliberately irregular because predictability is the enemy of control. When the target can anticipate the next gust, they can prepare a defence. The manipulator’s brilliance (or pathology, depending on your lens) lies in making each shift feel like a surprise, a fresh emotional weather event that forces the target to constantly readjust their internal compass.
Why It’s Not “Just Their Personality”
Many dismiss manipulators as “just being difficult” or “having a bad temperament.” Yet the hot‑and‑cold, nasty‑nice, close‑distant cycle is far more than a quirky personality trait. It is a learned strategy, often honed in environments where affection was conditional, love was a bargaining chip, or power dynamics were skewed from an early age. Children who grew up with caregivers who alternated between overwhelming love and punitive neglect can internalise this rhythm as the only way to secure affection. As adults, they replicate the pattern, consciously or unconsciously, because it feels familiar—even if it is toxic.
In therapeutic circles, this is sometimes called “trauma bonding”: the same neurochemical loop that keeps victims attached to abusive partners, gang members, or cult leaders. The manipulator supplies the “high” (warmth) and the “low” (rejection) in a way that makes the bond feel indestructible.
Breaking the Cycle
Understanding the mechanics is the first step toward stepping out of the storm.
Name the Pattern – Recognise when you’re being swung from heat to cold. Labelling it as “intermittent reinforcement” removes some of its mystique.
Set Boundaries – Decide what level of inconsistency you will tolerate. If the manipulator’s cold snaps become longer than a week, enforce a personal limit: “If you’re not ready to talk, I’ll give you space, but I won’t stay in limbo forever.”
Re‑wire the Reward – Seek the dopamine hit elsewhere—friends, hobbies, personal achievements. The less you rely on the manipulator’s erratic warmth, the weaker their grip becomes.
Seek External Perspective – Talk to a therapist or a trusted confidant. An outside voice can spot the “nice” moments that you might be using to excuse the “nasty” ones.
Know When to Walk – If the pattern persists despite your boundaries, recognise that the storm may never calm. Walking away isn’t a defeat; it’s reclaiming your own weather forecast.
The Closing Light
A candle does not stay lit forever on a windy night. Eventually the wax melts, the wick burns out, and the flame extinguishes. Manipulators, too, have limits. Their hot‑and‑cold tactics drain not only the target but also themselves—maintaining the act requires constant emotional labour, deception, and the ever‑looming fear of being exposed.
When you see someone flickering in contradictory directions, remember that you hold the power to douse the flame. You can choose to step back into a calm, well‑lit room where warmth is consistent, where kindness isn’t a weapon, and where distance is a sign of respect, not a tactic for control. The storm may still roar outside, but within the walls you build, the candle you ignite can burn—steady, bright, and on your own terms.
—
See also:
Worldwide Temple of Aurora 