To describe the character of the Buddha is to describe a mirror that has been polished until it is perfectly still. He was not a god, nor a prophet, but a man who stepped out of the furnace of human experience and found a way to stop the burning.
If you were to sit before Siddhartha Gautama—the man who became the Buddha—you would not be struck by theatrical power or the charisma of a conqueror. You would, instead, be struck by a profound, almost unnerving transparency.
The first quality of his character was an absolute, radical wakefulness. While most people move through life in a dream of “I” and “mine”—clinging to reputations, histories, and desires—the Buddha walked as if he had just woken from a fever. He possessed the stillness of a deep well; you could throw the sharpest stones of insults or the heavy weights of praise into his presence, and they would simply sink to the bottom without ruffling the surface.
He was defined by a clinical, unflinching compassion. There is a common misconception that peace means indifference, but the Buddha was quite the opposite. His compassion was not a soft, sentimental glow; it was a surgical tool. He possessed a terrifyingly clear understanding of why people suffered. Because he knew exactly what it felt like to crave, to lose, and to fear, he approached every person—from the lowest thief to the highest king—with a level of patience that felt like an infinite space. He never seemed hurried. He never seemed to be waiting for his turn to speak.
He was also a figure of ironic detachment. In the ancient texts, he is often portrayed with a dry, pedagogical wit. When confronted with metaphysical debates or existential grandstanding, he would often sidestep the philosophy with a pragmatic parable. He was fond of the analogy of a man shot by a poisoned arrow; the man doesn’t ask who made the bow, what colour the feathers are, or who the archer is—he simply wants the arrow removed. The Buddha’s character was rooted in this “medicine-man” practicality. He was the great physician of the human condition, perpetually asking, “Does this lead to the cessation of suffering?” If it did not, he simply walked away.
Perhaps the most remarkable trait was his lack of an ego-fortress. He lived without the armour that most of us wear. Because he no longer identified with his body, his name, or his history, he was impossible to offend. You could treat him with cruelty, and he would respond with a stillness that forced you to look at your own anger, not his. He became a window through which others saw their own minds reflected back at them.
In the end, describing the Buddha is like describing the wind by the way it moves the leaves. He left no monuments, no empire, and no dogma to be worshiped. He left a trail of footprints leading toward a door he had already opened. He was, above all else, a man who had finally stopped struggling against reality—a man who had learned how to rest, even in the middle of a world that never sleeps.
—
Image source:
Worldwide Temple of Aurora 
.jpg#mw-jump-to-license){kind=link}